When Thinking Became Treason

This article is part of a series on navigating our polarized moment through Hermetic wisdom. See also: The Divided States of America: Finding Balance in a Polarized World and the practical companion piece Navigating the Divide: A Practical Q&A for Polarized Times.

There is a question that sits heavy in the air right now… one most people feel but few are willing to speak aloud.

When did asking questions become an act of war?

When did "I'm not sure about that" start sounding like treason? When did we arrive at a place where thinking… genuinely thinking… feels like betraying your own people?

This isn't a left problem or a right problem. It's a human problem. And it didn't happen by accident.

There are patterns here… recurring dynamics that surface whenever societies fracture along ideological lines. These patterns aren't mysterious. They're observable. Predictable. And once you see them, you can't unsee them.

This isn't about picking a side. It's about understanding why both sides are using the same playbook… and why that playbook makes critical thinking feel like disloyalty.

The Cult-vs-Cult Problem

Let's start with the uncomfortable part.

Both political poles have developed cult-like dynamics. Not metaphorically. Structurally.

Look at the behaviors:

• Moral purity tests. Say the wrong word, question the wrong doctrine, and you're out. Not wrong… contaminated.
• Excommunication of dissenters. People who question the narrative don't get debated. They get expelled. Unfollowed. Unfriended. Fired.
• Leader worship. Figures who would have been considered fringe twenty years ago now command absolute loyalty. Criticism of them is criticism of the cause itself.
• Apocalyptic language. Every election is the last election. Every policy disagreement is existential. The other side isn't wrong… they're evil.

And here's why that matters:

If you ask too many questions, you threaten the cohesion. If you think too independently, you become unreliable. If you apply the same standards to your own side that you apply to the other… you become a traitor.

Critical thinking doesn't feel like betrayal because people are stupid. It feels like betrayal because the group's survival depends on you not doing it.

When Identity Replaces Thought

How did we get here?

Part of it is that politics has become identity.

Not just "I vote this way." But "I am this way." My politics are my values, my community, my sense of self, my answer to the question "who am I?"

This is why people can watch their own side do something they would have condemned five years ago… and find a way to justify it. Because admitting it's wrong would mean admitting they were wrong. And that's not a policy disagreement anymore. That's an existential threat.

Narratives now shape reality more than facts.

Repetition beats evidence. Emotional resonance beats logical consistency. The story that feels right wins over the story that is right.

We've outsourced our thinking to slogans, memes, and influencers. And when someone asks us to think for ourselves… it feels like they're asking us to abandon our people.

"To exchange one orthodoxy for another is not necessarily an advance. The enemy is the gramophone mind, whether or not one agrees with the record that is being played at the moment." — George Orwell

Why Outrage Always Wins

There's a reason extreme voices dominate the conversation.

It's not because they're more correct. It's because they vibrate louder.

The loudest voice in the room isn't the wisest. It's just the loudest.

This creates a brutal selection pressure. Moderate voices get drowned out. Thoughtful takes get ignored. The people who rise to the top of the attention economy are the ones willing to say the most inflammatory thing… because that's what the system rewards.

We mistake intensity for truth.

Someone speaking with absolute certainty sounds like they know something. Someone screaming about the apocalypse sounds like they care more. Someone who refuses to acknowledge any nuance sounds like they have conviction.

But intensity isn't truth. It's just volume.

And we've built information systems that select for volume over substance.

"A mind is like a parachute. It doesn't work if it is not open." — Frank Zappa

The System That Produces This

Here's where we can exhale a little.

This isn't happening because people are fundamentally broken. It's happening because polarization is engineered, rewarded, and monetized.

Follow the incentives:

• Media makes money from conflict. Calm, nuanced coverage doesn't generate clicks. Outrage does. Fear does. "The other side is destroying everything" does.
• Algorithms amplify division. Social media platforms are optimized for engagement, and nothing engages like tribal conflict. The algorithm doesn't care about truth. It cares about time-on-platform.
• Political fundraising runs on fear. Every email, every text, every ad is designed to make you feel like the world ends if you don't donate right now. Calm supporters don't open their wallets. Terrified ones do.

This doesn't mean individuals have no responsibility. But it means the environment is tilted. The game is rigged toward extremity. People are swimming in currents designed to pull them apart.

Understanding this helps. It shifts the question from "why are people so terrible?" to "why does this system produce these outcomes?"

And systems can be changed.

The Swing We're Already In

Societies don't stay in one place. They swing.

This isn't prediction. It's observation. It's what happens every time a society refuses balance.

The Puritans created the conditions for the libertine Restoration. The excesses of the Roaring Twenties preceded the moral conservatism of the Depression era. The counterculture of the 1960s triggered the backlash of the 1980s.

What refuses balance eventually swings violently toward it.

We're in a swing right now. You can feel it. One side overreaches, the other side responds with equal force in the opposite direction, and the center becomes a no-man's-land where anyone who stands gets shot at from both sides.

This isn't sustainable. The pendulum will move. The question is whether it moves through gradual correction or violent collapse.

History suggests the answer depends on whether enough people can step outside the swing… see it for what it is… and stop feeding it.

The Missing Balance

There's a deeper imbalance underneath all of this.

Healthy systems require both structure and adaptability. Logic and empathy. Boundaries and care. The capacity to say "no" and the capacity to say "I understand."

What do we have instead?

• Weaponized emotion without grounding. Feelings become arguments. Outrage becomes policy. But emotion without structure is chaos.
• Rigid ideology without compassion. Rules become ends in themselves. Doctrine replaces discernment. But structure without empathy is cruelty.

Both sides accuse the other of this imbalance. And both sides are right.

One side has abandoned reason in favor of feeling. The other has abandoned compassion in favor of order. Neither can admit their own dysfunction because admitting it would mean the other side has a point.

That's the swing we're in. That's why it feels so unstable. The missing piece isn't one side winning. It's both sides recovering what they've lost.

What Democratic Adulthood Looks Like

So what do we do?

We grow up.

Not in a condescending way. In a literal way. We develop the capacity to hold complexity without collapsing into tribalism.

The Practice

Democratic adulthood means:

• Tolerating ambiguity. Accepting that most issues are genuinely complicated and that certainty is often a sign of incomplete understanding.
• Applying consistent standards. Holding your own side to the same expectations you hold the other side. Not because you're disloyal, but because you're honest.
• Distinguishing intensity from truth. Learning to notice when you're being emotionally manipulated and choosing not to let that manipulation drive your beliefs.
• Seeing systems, not just actors. Understanding that polarization is produced by incentive structures, not just bad people.
• Taking responsibility for your own inner state. Recognizing that if your inner world is fractured, your outer world will reflect that. A fractured inner world produces a fractured republic.

"The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and still retain the ability to function." — F. Scott Fitzgerald

This isn't passivity. It's the hardest form of engagement there is.

It means staying in the conversation without becoming captured by either side. It means thinking for yourself even when that thinking costs you belonging. It means accepting that you might be wrong… about some things, about many things… and that this is okay.

Not by becoming apathetic. By becoming integrated. By doing the inner work that makes us harder to manipulate.

The Patterns Beneath the Noise

Here's the thing about what we've been exploring.

These aren't new dynamics. They're ancient.

The relationship between narrative and reality (Mentalism). The way extremes mirror each other (Polarity). The contagion of emotional intensity (Vibration). The pendulum swings of history (Rhythm). The way incentive structures shape outcomes (Cause & Effect). The need for balance between opposing principles (Gender). The correspondence between inner and outer worlds (Correspondence).

These patterns were articulated thousands of years ago. Philosophers observed them. Mystics named them. They've been called different things in different traditions.

For those curious, one articulation comes from the Seven Hermetic Principles… a framework that predates modern psychology by millennia but describes the same dynamics we're living through right now.

You don't need to adopt any particular belief system to see these patterns. You just need to look.

And once you see them, the question shifts.

It's no longer "why is everyone else so crazy?"

It's "how do I stay sane in a system designed to make me crazy?"

The Grounding Truth

Here it is, without mysticism or politics:

We are living in a period where loyalty is demanded and thought is punished.

That is historically common. And it is historically temporary.

Every cult eventually meets its limit. Every system that survives on suppressing questions eventually runs out of believers. Every pendulum eventually swings.

Our task is not to fix the world by force. Our task is to remain thinking people in a system that profits from thoughtlessness.

That means:

• Questioning our own side when our own side deserves questioning
• Refusing to let outrage replace analysis
• Recognizing that intensity is not truth
• Seeing the humanity in people we disagree with
• Doing our own inner work so we're harder to destabilize

This isn't betrayal. This is what functional democracies require.

Critical thinking didn't become betrayal because thinking is wrong. It became betrayal because cults can't survive scrutiny and we've built a society that rewards cult dynamics.

We can choose differently. We can think anyway.

Not because we're above it all. Because we're in it… and we'd rather be whole than captured.

"Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that." — Martin Luther King Jr.

Continue the Journey

This article explores the why behind our fractured moment. For the how — practical guidance on navigating family relationships, systemic change, spreading critical thinking, and dealing with unchecked lies — see the companion piece:

Navigating the Divide: A Practical Q&A for Polarized Times

For a deeper exploration of how to find the center point and actively shift the vibration from fear to connection, see:

The Divided States of America: Finding Balance in a Polarized World

For those who want to explore the recurring patterns mentioned in this article, they were articulated in ancient times as the Seven Hermetic Principles: Mentalism, Correspondence, Vibration, Polarity, Rhythm, Cause and Effect, and Gender. These aren't religious doctrines… they're observations about how systems behave. And they're as relevant now as they've ever been.

Have questions or topics you'd like explored? Drop me a line at alex@hermeticpath.com.

Blog Home